My Posts

Mine has been sent back to Germany to correct running too fast. I cannot wait to get it back. It has been gone since very early May. Enjoy yours!! Marc

For me, the bold, large display of the time, vs the small off-center display in the Duometre, is more pleasing. But I completely understand the attraction of the Duometre, and if it were 39 or even 40mm, would still be in my collection! Best, Marc

I reallt\y debated with myself for sometime before going with the "warmer" RG version. I have the WG in the Lange 1815 Chrono, and while I love this watch as well, it definitely is quite "austere" in WG. Here is a quick wrist shot of my RG version of the 5247. Thanks for your great post! Marc

I recently saw a post elsewhere about this marvel and started to think (always leads to problems in my case!): while I love the JLC Duometre a chronograph...it just felt too big on my wrist, and subsequently it did not enjoy a lot of wrist time. Well, I traded it off for this: These pictures don't r

I have enjoyed this watch as well since Dec 2009. It remains one of my favorites. My only gripe is that my wrist is really too small to absorb the 42mm case. Much better for me would be 38mm. Thanks for your great review. Marc

No message body

Here is my newest acquisition. I love how this 39mm marvel sits on my wrist. I am curious about production timing...a recent poster showed us his beautiful 0808/1000. I was told by my AD that mine "just arrived" last Wednesday (May 16). It is numbered 475/1000. Was it sitting around Breguet's factor