Good idea, but no chance ...

Jun 13, 2002,11:11 AM
 

GO marches into a different direction: Although part of the Swatch Group, it tries to become technically as independent from the group as possible. This implies that they would not buy any complication or escapement system from Swatch. The same is done within the UNION line: All watches incorporating technology bought from outside are dropped, with the exception of jewels and springs, GO is proud of producing AND developing all parts of their movements themselves. Just yesterday I had a brief 'dispute' with Heinz W. Pfeifer, when I dared to speculate if Renaud & Papi, the expert for tourbillons, was possibly involved in the development of GO's flying tourbillon. He informed me - and strongly he did that - that GO did all the development work in their own house.

Having said that, it would be against GO's philosophy to buy technology from outside experts or companies, even if it were interesting.

Marcus


More posts: Ballon BleuFlying Tourbillon

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

An idea for GO (as a company of Swatch Group)

 
 By: Brad McCormick : June 6th, 2002-07:07
I just thought of a way that GO could benefit from being part of Swatch Group. Especially since GO seems to be interested in unusual movements these days, why not GO make a model with the Daniels coaxial escapement (from fellow Swatch Group company Omega)... 

Good idea, but no chance ...

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : June 13th, 2002-11:11